首页> 外文OA文献 >Inactivation of Adenoviruses, Enteroviruses, and Murine Norovirus in Water by Free Chlorine and Monochloramine▿
【2h】

Inactivation of Adenoviruses, Enteroviruses, and Murine Norovirus in Water by Free Chlorine and Monochloramine▿

机译:游离氯和一氯胺使水中的腺病毒,肠病毒和鼠诺如病毒失活▿

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Inactivation of infectious viruses during drinking water treatment is usually achieved with free chlorine. Many drinking water utilities in the United States now use monochloramine as a secondary disinfectant to minimize disinfectant by-product formation and biofilm growth. The inactivation of human adenoviruses 2, 40, and 41 (HAdV2, HAdV40, and HAdV41), coxsackieviruses B3 and B5 (CVB3 and CVB5), echoviruses 1 and 11 (E1 and E11), and murine norovirus (MNV) are compared in this study. Experiments were performed with 0.2 mg of free chlorine or 1 mg of monochloramine/liter at pH 7 and 8 in buffered reagent-grade water at 5°C. CT values (disinfectant concentration × time) for 2- to 4-log10 (99 to 99.99%) reductions in virus titers were calculated by using the efficiency factor Hom model. The enteroviruses required the longest times for chlorine inactivation and MNV the least time. CVB5 required the longest exposure time, with CT values of 7.4 and 10 mg·min/liter (pH 7 and 8) for 4-log10 inactivation. Monochloramine disinfection was most effective for E1 (CT values ranged from 8 to 18 mg·min/liter for 2- and 3-log10 reductions, respectively). E11 and HAdV2 were the least susceptible to monochloramine disinfection (CT values of 1,300 and 1,600 mg-min/liter for 3-log10 reductions, respectively). Monochloramine inactivation was most successful for the adenoviruses, CVB5, and E1 at pH 7. A greater variation in inactivation rates between viruses was observed during monochloramine disinfection than during chlorine disinfection. These data will be useful in drinking water risk assessment studies and disinfection system planning.
机译:饮用水处理过程中感染性病毒的灭活通常是通过游离氯实现的。现在,美国许多饮用水企业都使用一氯胺作为辅助消毒剂,以最大程度地减少消毒剂副产物的形成和生物膜的生长。在此比较了人腺病毒2、40和41(HAdV2,HAdV40和HAdV41),柯萨奇病毒B3和B5(CVB3和CVB5),回声病毒1和11(E1和E11)以及鼠诺如病毒(MNV)的失活。研究。在pH值为7和8的缓冲试剂级水中,在5℃下,以0.2 mg游离氯或1 mg一氯胺/升进行实验。使用效率因子Hom模型计算出病毒滴度降低2至4 log10(99至99.99%)的CT值(消毒剂浓度×时间)。肠病毒需要最长时间进行氯灭活,而MNV需要最少时间。 CVB5需要最长的暴露时间,对于4-log10灭活,CT值为7.4和10 mg·min / L(pH 7和8)。一氯胺消毒对E1最有效(CT值范围从8至18 mg·min / L,分别减少2-log和3-log10)。 E11和HAdV2对一氯胺消毒的敏感度最低(减少3-log10时的CT值分别为1,300和1,600 mg-min / L)。在pH值为7的情况下,腺病毒,CVB5和E1的单氯胺灭活最成功。与氯消毒相比,在一氯胺消毒期间观察到病毒之间的灭活速率变化更大。这些数据将有助于饮用水风险评估研究和消毒系统规划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号